Ich frage mich, wieso AGD Interaktive sich nicht gleich auf den vierten Teil gestürzt hat und so "Infamous" den dritten Teil überlassen hat? Was solls, ich freu mich drauf!
Die Antwort auf Deine Frage findest Du im Forum von AGD Interactive:
The answer to the question: "why this game" is really quite simple. When the project was started, King's Quest III was THE game most fans wished for if AGD Interactive (then Tierra Entertainment) were to do another remake besides Quest for Glory II. The poll and resulting discussion took place in this thread. It was posted some time before King's Quest II+: Romancing the Stones went live and the winning option was rather obvious. The choice was also not at all unpopular with the Tierra team itself. King's Quest II+ writer Wookie had already written a basic screenplay for King's Quest III prior to King's Quest II: Romancing the Stones' release and King's Quest III itself was AGD1's first Sierra game so it held dear personal memories for her. At the same time, development on both Al Emmo an the Lost Dutchman's Mine and the Quest for Glory II remake was more or less starting, so adding King's Quest III to the busy schedule seemed overambitious.
Dieser Thread erläutert die Entstehungsgeschichte von KQ3 Redux recht ausführlich.